<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Bruce Clay, Inc. Blog</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/" />
<modified>2008-08-07T17:59:01Z</modified>
<tagline>Internet Marketing News and Advice: Search Engine Optimization, PPC, Analytics, Email Marketing and Branding</tagline>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="4.1">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, Guest Author</copyright>

<entry>
<title>The Adolescence of SEO</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/the_adolescence.html" />
<modified>2008-08-07T17:59:01Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-07T17:49:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1467</id>
<created>2008-08-07T17:49:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Kate Morris is our next guestblogger. She&apos;s going to share some war stories and give us some food for thought about SEO&apos;s growing pains.--Susan Back in the day, selling SEO/M services was relatively easy. The internet was &quot;new,&quot; business owners were completely oblivious to the craft of search...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>SEM Industry</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Kate Morris is our next guestblogger.  She's going to share some war stories and give us some food for thought about SEO's growing pains.--Susan</i></p>

<p>Back in the day, selling SEO/M services was relatively easy. The internet was "new," business owners were completely oblivious to the craft of search engine optimization, and were willing to pay people to "get them on the web."  Those were the days when SEOs spent the majority of time on education (as much as we hated it), the rest on keyword density and link building. Life was good.</p>

<p>Today we are at the point when we not only get clients that have never done search engine marketing, but also the clients that:</p>

<ul>
	<li>are not happy with the service they are getting with another reputable agency</li>
	<li>got duped by one of the many the SEO scams out there</li>
	<li>have decided that they want to bring the service in-house</li>
</ul>

<p>There are many reasons why they want to change tactics, some good and some bad. The good reasons maybe that the in-house has reached their threshold and need help in specific areas. The current agency may be too focused on core tactics and the client wants something more. This can sometimes be a bad thing though, especially when the client thinks they are getting high level services when they are only getting the bare minimum. This is starting to happen more and more recently.</p>

<p>On the flip side, the client may have been talked into doing some pretty shady things, made some bad decisions, and aren't even aware they are being penalized for the actions of others. All they know is their online traffic and sales have dropped. We have all seen the horror stories, but here are a few of the most recent ones I've seen.</p>

<ul>
	<li><strong>Paid links through brokers</strong><br>

<p>This is a grey area for most people in SEM, but we all know if found selling, you can get penalized. If found buying, the links don't work as they were supposed to work. What happens is some agencies have not made their clients aware of this. That $10K spent on links? Worthless. It's not a fact over the entire internet, but it is becoming a reality more and more every day.</li></p>

<p>	<li><strong>Traffic Power and other nominal monthly fee products</strong></br></p>

<p>This was one of the most common ones, but thankfully business owners are getting a little smarter about these promises. Score one for the SEM industry. But it does still happen, clients pay $500 to be #1, and get nothing. Reeducation about expectations and actual prices of services can be difficult in these situations.</li></p>

<p>	<li><strong>JavaScript &lt;body&gt; redirect</strong></br></p>

<p>One client had previously had terrible cloaking technologies implemented on their site, a JavaScript onMouseOver event that triggered a redirect within the &lt;body&gt; tag. Apparently, this was done by the agency in a wholesale manner to hundreds of clients. Ouch</li></p>

<p>	<li><strong>.asp doorway pages</strong></br></p>

<p>An agency once had created .asp doorway pages that referenced pages on the client's website. So instead of having the real pages on the clients' actually site, they were just being pulled in from the SEO's server. And when the client didn't renew their services, the SEO Company killed all of the pages that were being pulled in by the clients' site.</li></p>

<p>	<li><strong>Stolen Content</strong></br></p>

<p>In one instance, a new client had an in-house employee doing all of their SEO/web design before they changed services. It turns out that the in-house guy had stolen all of the content for their informational pages from a competitor's site that was going well in the rankings. And to top it off, the guy actually left all of the links within the content that was pointing to the site they he had stolen the content from.</li></p>

<p>	<li><strong>Hidden Links</strong> </br></p>

<p>One of my first stories, a client's last in-house had placed hidden links in their ecommerce system, built in house and licensed to other companies. So these links to an internal site (one of about thirty) were on other's sites. I found it because a client called and complained, rightfully. I removed all instances of the hidden links and educated the company on Google guidelines. They hired the guy back when I left... </li><br />
</ul></p>

<p>What's my point? Just to tell you horror stories? We love to hear them, it builds camaraderie ... okay, I have a point, swear.</p>

<p>My point is that we have to change how we present our services.<strong> SEO is not dead</strong> as many have suggested. It's just that sales pitches are no longer just about building presence online and conversions, but rather perfecting the system. Clients today are looking for the next step; they want the idea that is going to set them apart online since some industries are in <strong>tough</strong> battles for top spots in the SERPs. </p>

<p>When you are approaching a new client that has been with former agencies or services, plainly ask that perspective company what is wrong with their website and how they would fix it. This will give you some insight to where they are in the process and where you need to start. Then you can launch into how you can help. While you do not have to go into detail (but some free advice will sometimes close the deal real fast), the fact that you are willing to tell them what is wrong will let them know that you know what you should know about SEO.</p>

<p><strong>Tip for Agencies:</strong> If you have a sales team, teach them the basics (training is key!) but also teach them how to identify the clients wanting that next step and what to pitch to them. All small business owners want SEO to be a process and it can be, but those same small business owners are getting smart. We've done our job for some of them, and they now want us to go the extra mile. </p>

<p><em><strong>It's time for us as internet marketers to step outside the box and get back to our creative core. Internet marketing is not a process, it's an adventure. </strong></em></p>

<p><i>Kate Morris is the In-House SEM for<a href="http://www.rategenius.com/"> RateGenius</a>. You can find her on her blog and on Twitter. She wants to thank Casey Yandle and Scott Polk for their examples.</i><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Hierarchy of Social Media Needs</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/hierarchy_of_so.html" />
<modified>2008-08-07T17:49:07Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-07T17:44:35Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1466</id>
<created>2008-08-07T17:44:35Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Guestblogging week continues with the awesome Dana Larson who is going to school us all on the psychology of social media marketing. --Susan We all know by now that in order to become a true social media maven, one must spend time within each specific social community and...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Branding</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Guestblogging week continues with the awesome Dana Larson who is going to school us all on the psychology of social media marketing. --Susan</i></p>

<p>We all know by now that in order to become a true social media maven, one must spend time within each specific social community and actually participate (and if you don't know that by now, you are doing it all terribly, terribly wrong). Social sites are not designed for the classic swoop-and-dump (think seagulls) tactic, so users need to be careful with how they are using social media for marketing and what kind of information to pass along to other users.</p>

<p>Do you think I'm wrong? Example: You don't go onto a social network and start shouting out, "Hey! Check out this super cool site I just found! You can get great deals on baby clothes from them! Visit www.buy-my-baby-clothes.com/?affiliateid=LOSER" because then you get un-friended. In this situation, you would find those who are having babies or thinking about having babies and make a suggestion,  "I was thinking of you when I came across this baby boutique and thought it might be cute for your little one." See? That's nice. It's relevant.</p>

<p>But why should we be taking our time networking with other users? Why do we get banned if we aren't using the social media sites correctly? I'll say "because it's polite" and give my baby example above. But the reasons could go much deeper than just a simple one-sentence answer. As tempting as it may be for marketers to practice the drive by link drop, there's a good reason time should be spent networking with other users, submitting useful content, voting things up/down and ultimately "participating" with the community.   It's about needs. Yours and mine.</p>

<p>In 1943, <a href="http://www.envisionsoftware.com/articles/Maslows_Needs_Hierarchy.html">Dr. Abraham Maslow</a> published an article called "A Theory of Human Motivation" in which he described a needs-based framework of human motivation. Basically Maslow said that humans are motivated by needs that are unsatisfied. One cannot attain higher need goals if the basic needs are not met.</p>

<p><strong>Physiological Needs</strong><br />
Maslow outlines the physiological needs as those necessary to sustain life. Those needs include the basics, such as:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Food</li>
	<li>	Water</li>
	<li>	Shelter</li>
	<li>	Sleep</li>
</ul>

<p>If these needs are not satisfied, the individual will be urged to find a way to satisfy them. These basics of life are the motivators for getting out of bed in the morning.</p>

<p>Within the social media world, these basics of life can be compared to creating an account and updating a profile. This profile is a place to "shelter" all your information and what you feed off of when you begin networking with other individuals on a certain social site. Before you can begin anything else within the social community, you need a substantial profile (a.k.a. home).</p>

<p><strong>Safety Needs</strong><br />
Safety and security are next on Maslow's journey. Once the basic needs are met, one feels the need to make sure one's life is safe and secure. The safety needs include:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Insurance</li>
	<li>	Job security</li>
	<li>	In-case-of-emergency finances</li>
</ul>

<p>Further needs will not be met if the person feels unsafe or threatened in any way.</p>

<p>When would a person feel threatened within a social media setting? Feeling insecure and unaware of popular topics in different social sites can definitely make a person feel threatened. Being repetitively "poked", "friended" or intruded upon by social marketers may not feel threatening or unsafe, but when they fail to stop, it comes pretty close. This is why so many of us start out by building our profiles in social sites we are comfortable in: voting up stories that we know about, chatting in forums where we are an "expert" or creating groups based on our favorite topics. Once we are safe and comfortable within our own knowledge base, we can branch out to others.</p>

<p><strong>Social Needs</strong><br />
This says it all, right?</p>

<p>Maslow says that once the lower needs are met, the person pushes forward into the higher level needs. Social needs are all about the interaction with others, such as:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Loving</li>
	<li>	Friendship</li>
	<li>	Being in a group/club</li>
</ul>

<p>It just makes sense that once you feel secure in your new social community and have done the work to build up your profile by commenting on items on which you are familiar that you will feel the need to make friends. And lots of them! When making friends or adding followers, be polite and respectful to them, and do them a favor every once in a while. See someone ask for a Digg on Twitter? Sure, Digg it for them if it's interesting. They will probably reciprocate the favor later.</p>

<p><strong>Esteem Needs</strong><br />
Now that you have friends and you feel like you "belong", Maslow says the person needs to feel accomplishment and respect. Higher self-esteem can come from both internal and external motivational forms. Examples of internal motivators are:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Self-respect</li>
	<li>	Accomplishment</li>
</ul>

<p>External motivators can include:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Social status</li>
	<li>	Recognition</li>
</ul>

<p>Social media-wise, once you've created your profile, built it up by networking within your comfort zone, made some good friends and added value to the community, other community members will begin to recognize you. A higher social media self esteem will motivate you to showcase your work and interests more and network to increase your "personal brand". You will also see more comments on your submissions and posts and have more people engage with your conversations because they feel they "know" you. </p>

<p>Using the same screenname and avatar helps too, because then your friends can easily find you across multiple social media channels, building up your popularity even more.</p>

<p><strong>Self-Actualization</strong><br />
The pinnacle of Maslow's theory, self-actualization is when the individual reaches their fullest potential as a human. However, Maslow says that this level is never fully satisfied; there is always room to grow.</p>

<p>When a person has reached a state of self-actualization, they will feel content and satisfied for the time being, motivated by any or all of these factors:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Truth</li>
	<li>	Justice</li>
	<li>	<strike>The American Way</strike> :) Wisdom</li>
</ul>

<p>Then the person comes down from their peak experience when they need to attain another form of self-actualization. Once this area is reached, bouncing up and down is quite normal. </p>

<p>One might say that for a social media maven, self-actualization can be reached when becoming the utmost resource for a specific topic or maybe just a power user on Digg. Such self-actualized social media mavens are sought after to provide truth and wisdom to others. This power user becomes the go-to-person because of the huge amount of influence they have. Has anyone created a "I Wanna Be Like <a href="http://www.techipedia.com/">Tamar</a>" shirt yet? Because I think they should.</p>

<p>But, as Maslow states, there is always more to learn and soon this self-actualized individual will need to learn even more and possibly hit a new peak with this new topic as well.</p>

<p>Because social media is about community and participation, the more time spent communicating and providing value to other social media members the more your knowledge and personal social credibility are increased. Understanding these steps and why we take our time to network through online sharing, poking, Plurking, voting, Twittering and throwing a few sheep once in a while can help make sense of it all. Once each set of needs are followed - for yourself and those you are communicating with - you can become a true social media maven.</p>

<p><br />
<em>Dana Larson is a Search Marketing Supervisor with <a href="http://www.toprankblog.com">TopRank Online Marketing.</a> She works with a multitude of search marketing tactics and processes including SEO, blogging, link building and social media marketing.</em></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Live Search Updates Webmaster Tools</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/live_search_upd.html" />
<modified>2008-08-06T22:02:00Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-06T21:46:30Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1465</id>
<created>2008-08-06T21:46:30Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Lisa&apos;s soaking up the sun in Ensenada by now - lucky girl. On the up side, in Lisa&apos;s absence, we&apos;ve all gotten to enjoy the guest blog posts by some of the brightest and most impressive minds in search. And there&apos;s more to come! Thanks, ladies! It turns out that...</summary>
<author>
<name>Virginia Nussey</name>
<url>http://www.bruceclay.com/</url>
<email>vnussey@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>MSN Search</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Lisa's soaking up the sun in Ensenada by now - lucky girl. On the up side, in Lisa's absence, we've all gotten to enjoy the guest blog posts by some of the brightest and most impressive minds in search. And there's more to come! Thanks, ladies! </p>

<p>It turns out that not everyone's gotten to enjoy leisure time lately, as the Live Search Webmaster Center team has been hard at work preparing to roll out the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2008/08/06/live-search-webmaster-tools-update.aspx">first major update</a> to their Webmaster Tools since the November debut. Program Manager Jeremiah Andrick gave Bruce Clay, Inc. an advanced sneak peak of the update, and it appears that the new features address anticipated improvements to the Webmaster Tools.</p>

<p>The first thing that caught my eye is that the little "(beta)" has disappeared!</p>

<p>Webmaster Center this morning:</p>

<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/2739859876_7b0b6f119a_o.jpg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/2739859876_d5cd170b8f.jpg"></a></p>

<p>Webmaster Center following this afternoon's update:</p>

<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3145/2739021845_37e0330118_o.jpg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3145/2739021845_a3d0fb6b6f.jpg"></a> </p>

<p>That's right. Live Search's Webmaster Center is out of beta. When I talked to Jeremiah, he said that Webmaster Center's release from beta is just the beginning of their efforts to support the Web publishing community.</p>

<p>Jeremiah explained, "We have staffed a team of folks that are committed to providing more data about your site to improve crawling and developing a strong community around these tools to help answer your questions. We rely on the webmaster and publisher industry to provide us feedback on where we can improve and will continue to add new features and improvements in the future."</p>

<p>So what exactly are these nifty new features?</p>

<p><strong>Crawl Issues</strong>: Webmasters and SEOs will be pleased to see the report of issues Live Search found when crawling and indexing your site. The four issue types reported on are 404 errors, URLs blocked by Robots Exclusion Protocol, long dynamic URLs, and unsupported content-types. According to Jeremiah:</p>

<p>"By addressing these issues, webmaster can improve how Live Search sees them... We expect that a webmaster will use this report to identify these problems on their site and fix the issue with the broken link, or create a 301 redirect the URL to a more appropriate location."</p>

<p><strong>Backlinks</strong>: The new incarnation of Webmaster Tools offers an enhanced look at inbound links from external sites. Along with the increased quantity of reported inlinks - up to 1,000 can be downloaded - the improved backlinks tool is capable of filtering results by a number of factors. The new filter functionality allows sorting of backlinks from specific sites, sub-domains, or sub-folders, as well as backlinks from specified top level domains.</p>

<p><strong>More actionable data</strong>: The other cool new features included in today's update are intended to help make the data gleaned from the tools more actionable. Understanding that webmasters and SEOs will often need to import the data into offline programs such as Excel in order to analyze it, this update makes possible just such an action. The download option makes the first 1,000 results available in a CSV file that can be opened with Excel and other database or custom reporting tools. Advanced filtering, as demonstrated in my explanation of the improved backlinks feature, lets webmasters filter results by up to two sub-domains or two sub-folders, allowing for easier access to the desired gems without having to excavate entire mountain ranges. Both the download and filter options have been enabled on all reports, both old and new.</p>

<p>From the look of it, this update has gone a long way to improving the resource that is Live Search's Webmaster Tools. Interested in seeing the update yourself? I don't blame you. <a href="http://webmaster.live.com/">Give it a spin</a> and let us know what you think! <br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>CMS is Not a Four Letter Word</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/cms_is_not_a_fo.html" />
<modified>2008-08-06T21:43:27Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-06T20:49:03Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1464</id>
<created>2008-08-06T20:49:03Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Our second blogger today is Megan Slick. Megan and Smart Solutions would like to get your thoughts on CMS. The Content Management System (CMS) was born out of needs. These needs included: Non-technical website owners having the ability to update their sites in a friendly WYSIWYG Scalability for...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Our second blogger today is Megan Slick.  Megan and Smart Solutions would like to get your thoughts on CMS.</i></p>

<p>The Content Management System (CMS) was born out of needs.  These needs included:</p>

<ul>
	<li>	Non-technical website owners having the ability to update their sites in a friendly WYSIWYG</li>
	<li>	Scalability for medium sites to grow into enterprise websites</li>
</ul>

<p>When websites tipped and every company needed to have a website, the CMS solved many a company's woes.  However, in giving non-technical people 'control', developers inadvertently took control away because the people using the system needed to be managed.  I have often thought the word 'management' in content management system has a dual meaning.  Non-technical users have the ability to manage their content, while the CMS manages them by performing functions they would otherwise not be able to perform.  That in a nutshell is the past of CMS.  </p>

<p>Fast forward to the present, we all have more needs and desires when it comes to our CMS.  This has sadly led to huge, bloated CMSs that do 'everything' but when it comes to changing those little meta tags, uh-uh, no way, that's automatic.  Many systems do not allow you access to the code.  So in an effort to overly help non-technical people, the CMS has taken away most of the control from the technical people.  It is no wonder that the SEO and design communities are disgruntled by them.  Most SEOs and designers inherit horrible CMSs that confine their creativity and make their jobs much more difficult.  </p>

<p>"SEO Friendly" is all the rage among CMS companies now.  What does that even mean?  One of the definitions provided by Merriam-Webster.com is "not hostile."  I'm sorry, I expect a little more from a CMS than not being hostile to search engines.  So now the CMSs are using crawlablitiy as a selling point.  Depending on the competitive nature of your keywords, it is often not good enough for a website to be crawlable; SEOs need the ability to optimize.  As a result, SEOs have taken steps to allow more control over the code for companies that still need CMS.  This includes: </p>

<ul>
	<li>	Open source CMSs with plug-ins </li>
	<li>	Custom CMSs</li>
</ul>

<p>Both of these solutions have given control to the technical people (the SEO firm, the IT department, the designers) but what about the non-technical people that need access to the company website (the Marketing department, the PR firm, etc...).  Using an open source CMS with plug-ins to soup it up is hardly going to be user-friendly and don't even get me started on the subject of umpteen versions in a given year.  Custom CMSs, while they are going to be perfectly suited to your needs today are only possible for a small percentage of businesses that can afford to take on an initiative so large.  Once the custom CMS is developed, the company is going to have to invest untold resources on updating.  </p>

<p>In the movie, <u>Little Women</u>, Jo March says, "Necessity is the mother of invention."  That means we are on the precipice of a <strong>CMS that steps up to the challenge.</strong>  Go ahead; call me the Pollyanna of CMS but I know that it will happen.  These needs are starting to hurt and when needs begin to cause discomfort, a solution is born.  The CMSs of the past solved nearly all of the hurdles of that day.  Well, the hurdles of today are different.  The internet has matured.  There is more competition, meaning companies cannot afford to do things wrong.  The companies of today need a more mature solution from CMS.  The future holds a CMS that is flexible and robust enough to handle the needs of the sophisticated SEO, developer and designer, while continuing to be easy for the non-technical owners. </p>

<p>What present and future needs do you want addressed by a content management system?  Readers of the Bruce Clay Blog, loyal followers of The Lisa, I have a simple question, what is your beef?  Non-technical and technical users of CMS - We want to know?  No pain is too small or insignificant to report - so let 'em rip.</p>

<p>Thank you Lisa and Bruce for the opportunity to guest blog!  It is quite the honor, since I am quite the fan.       </p>

<p><i>Megan Slick is the senior writer at <a href="http://www.insitecopy.com">InsiteCopy</a>, an SEO copywriting consultancy. She writes website copy for SEO firms including Smart Solutions.  <a href="http://www.smartz.com/Content-Management/default.aspx">Smart Solutions</a> provides a comprehensive, online content management system and search engine optimization with a focus on award-winning website design.</i></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Doing it like YouTube: Hosting and optimising video </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/doing_it_like_y.html" />
<modified>2008-08-06T21:59:43Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-06T20:40:39Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1463</id>
<created>2008-08-06T20:40:39Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Late start today for the guest bloggers, something that&apos;s entirely my fault I assure you. In order not to delay further, I&apos;ll get out of the way. Everyone welcome Kate to the blog.--Susan Loading multimedia into video sharing sites such as YouTube, Google Video and MetaCafe can help...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>International</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Late start today for the guest bloggers, something that's entirely my fault I assure you. In order not to delay further, I'll get out of the way. Everyone welcome Kate to the blog.--Susan</i></p>

<p>Loading multimedia into video sharing sites such as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/">YouTube,</a> <a href="http://video.google.com/">Google Video </a>and <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/">MetaCafe</a> can help to get your videos ranking in blended search results. But what happens if you want to host media on your own site to get that itsy bitsy ad sense revenue and some bit of ho hum traffic, but still want it to be available for indexing by search engines? Today we look at a couple of ways that you can create a page that will support the video optimisation process.</p>

<p>At <a href="http://www.searchmarketingexpo.com.au/">SMX Sydney,</a> Danny Sullivan covered the history of search where search 1.0 was based on keywords, search 2.0 was based on links and search 3.0 will be making search more vertical; understanding what we click on, what we visit and delivering personalised results including blended media types to users. Google wants to know when a video may be more relevant than a website; like searches on an artist or song name, "How To", "top tips" or even Product Demos, and serve it up from within their SERPs.</p>

<p>Videos don't necessarily rank in all indexes even though it might be the same search engine. Consider the search in Google.com from Australia and the same search made in the United States; different results will show. From our research we have found that blended search results are somewhat scarce in Google.com.au (search Australia) with less than 1%  of searches resulting in a blended result and in Google.com.au (search the web) only around 10%.  Google.com for similar search's showed on average around 20%; an indication that either the quality of digital media is higher in the Google.com index or the technology is more mature. Whichever way you look at it, blended search is here to stay and cannot be ignored. It provides an opportunity to extend your online reach and brand awareness through object centric media such as video. </p>

<p><strong>Checklist time: what do you need to make your video rank</strong></p>

<p>If you are serious about ranking your hosted videos take some time to look at the kind of blended results appearing for your keywords. As search engines are mostly blind to the content of your video, you have to tell them what the video is about by including relevant keywords on your video landing page and ensuring your Meta data tells a similar story.</p>

<p><strong>Copy YouTube</strong></p>

<p>You know videos get indexed when they are up on YouTube so why not take a design leaf from their book and apply it to your own website. </p>

<p><strong>Title - You enter one for your video when you load it:</strong> Did you know it appears up to 4 times in the source code of a YouTube page (the &lt;title&gt;, the Meta title, the 'on page' title, and once more in the java script).</p>

<p><strong>Description - You write one that accurately describes your video: </strong>YouTube repeats it at least twice in the code (Meta description and then again in the on page description). Google has even said creating a transcript of the video is recommended - don't make them guess. </p>

<p><strong>Tags - UGC Keywords:</strong> YouTube asks you to 'tag' your video to help them with internal site search, these tags are automatically adopted for the Meta keywords, they appear twice in the javascript and then again as a link on the page. Before you finish your video landing page on your own site ask yourself - do my keywords appear at least 4 times in the source code? This is the ranking environment and you got to be in it to win it. </p>

<p><strong>Name the video file:</strong> think about these things the way a search engine would - if your keyword is "Activities in Paris" loading  vid123885.wmv may be less successful when all else is equal than paris-activitys.wmv (although paris-activities-things-to-do-france-porn-paris.wmv may be overdoing it just a bit)</p>

<p><strong>www.mywebsite.com/video/keyword:</strong> Customize the URL of the page that houses the video to aid those ever important backlinks. Once everyone else has linked to you using your keywords check that your own site keeps to the same rules.</p>

<p><strong>Map it for Google to find it:</strong> Set up your Video Site Map to enhance and extend your XML loving as per the Webmaster Guidelines.  This will help ensure that your videos are indexed by Google video and the best bit is that you can re-use your title and description you spent so many hours obsessing over earlier...</p>

<p>Even though Google owns YouTube and so could be said to hold it a cut above the other video sharing sites, in reality the videos loaded here are still susceptible to spam just like any other page online. Spiders are trying to work out what content will be useful and YouTube video pages are crawled and assessed just like the rest. </p>

<p><br />
<i>Kate Gamble is an analyst with Bruce Clay Australia and enjoys the finer things online such as clean code, fascinating blogs, friendly comments and some of the worst search jokes around. She is a Twitterer, a Digger and an all round social media marketer.  She started SEO Sydney with some of the best in the business and looks forward to the day when Search Engine Optimisation Analyst becomes an easily recognised job description in pubs around Australia. </p>

<p>Kate has worked on a wide selection of blue chip corporate websites in Australia including industry leaders in travel, jobs, legal services, financial services, software and personals. Kate is completely gadget centric and when not with her Iphone or laptop you will find her riding her two horses in the national parks around Sydney. </i><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>That&apos;s Just Not Cuil</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/thats_just_not.html" />
<modified>2008-08-05T16:04:36Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-05T18:57:23Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1462</id>
<created>2008-08-05T18:57:23Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: (Super)mom Jordan McCollum just had a new baby girl and still managed to get us an entry for our Guest Blogging week. All I managed to do this morning was get coffee. Thanks, Jordan!--Susan For all the press it generated, it&apos;s not too surprising that Cuil didn&apos;t live...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Search Engines</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: (Super)mom Jordan McCollum just had a new baby girl and still managed to get us an entry for our Guest Blogging week. All I managed to do this morning was get coffee. Thanks, Jordan!--Susan</i></p>

<p>For all the press it generated, it's not too surprising that Cuil didn't live up to expectations.  While Cuil boasted it was bigger, more relevant and more private than Google, most people quickly panned the limited index, the three-column search results layout and the technical glitches.  But amid the mistakes of the launch, there were a few things they did right, too.</p>

<p><strong>Working against Cuil:</strong></p>

<p><strong>Hype</strong>&mdash;When the Wall Street Journal trumpets your launch, it's probably going to be difficult to keep up with not only the expectations you're setting, but also the traffic you get.  Remember, nothing kills an inferior product faster than superior PR.</p>

<p><strong>Selling points</strong>&mdash;You're certainly not going to impress people in the industry touting your index size and relevance (especially not if you don't live up to the claims).  While both of these metrics sound good to the average user, they're usually not enough to make them consider a permanent switch of their default search engine (again, especially not if you don't live up to the claims).</p>

<p><strong>Brand recognition</strong>&mdash;This is a big one.  If nobody can <em>spell</em> or <em>pronounce</em> your name, it will be exceedingly difficult for them to get to your site.  My husband works for a company with an unusually-spelled name like Cuil&mdash;it's pronounced like a "real" word, but it's not spelled like its homophone.  I can only imagine how much type-in traffic (not to mention email) is lost because people can't spell the name.  Yes, all the good domains are taken, but . . . come on.  That word is "quill."</p>

<p><strong>Brand recognition again</strong>&mdash;This is such a big one that it deserves mentioning again.  Remember that study last year, the one that said that people don't really "see" relevance?  What made them say <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/given-identical-search-results-searchers-still-prefer-google-yahoo.html">results were relevant was the brand</a> on the top of the page&mdash;the exact same results were magically more relevant with a Google or Yahoo logo.</p>

<p><strong>Actual traffic</strong>&mdash;Despite the fact that traffic overloaded Cuil's servers, during its first day of life, the search engine only barely cracked the top 10 search engines <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2008/07/cuil_stats_the_early_numbers.html">as measured by Hitwise</a>.  Tuesday, it slipped to #12.  Worse yet, more than a third of its first-day traffic was from other search engines (and more than a quarter came from news and media sites).  Breaking the top 20 during your first week is good, of course, but you might expect coverage by the WSJ would generate more than 0.6% of search engine traffic.</p>

<p><strong>Working for Cuil:</strong></p>

<p><strong>Attention</strong>&mdash;If you can get the WSJ to cover the launch, your PR department (or is that just PR person?) should get a pizza party.  Or at least a pizza.</p>

<p><strong>Focus on Google's weak point&mdash;privacy</strong>&mdash;While a lot of search engines do have excellent privacy features, privacy was probably the strongest of the three features that Cuil touted the most.  It was possibly the best selling point they were going to have.  With fervor over Google's perceived invasions of privacy renewed every few weeks, for the most part the only thing that has kept many of the privacy-emphasizing search engines back is lack of publicity&mdash;something Cuil had in spades.</p>

<p>The moral of the story: never, ever describe yourself (or allow yourself to be described, if you can help it) as a "Google killer."  We've been disappointed too many times by that hype.  It's a kiss of death.  </p>

<p>Instead (and this lesson isn't just for search engine startups), focus on things that are truly unique and worthwhile to your users&mdash;and deliver.</p>

<p><i><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/">Jordan McCollum</a> is the assistant editor of Marketing Pilgrim, an Internet marketing news site.  She has worked in search engine optimization, content creation, web analytics, and, of course, blogging.</i></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>iPhone as a Game Changer: Games, Rules &amp; How Things are Being Played</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/iphone_as_a_gam.html" />
<modified>2008-08-05T15:53:49Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-05T15:44:23Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1461</id>
<created>2008-08-05T15:44:23Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Day two of our Guest Blogging week begins with Cindy Krum, who takes us for a walk on the mobile marketing side. --Susan Everybody is talking about how the iPhone is changing the game for mobile marketing, and that might be true, but I don&apos;t know. A good...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Branding</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Day two of our Guest Blogging week begins with Cindy Krum, who takes us for a walk on the mobile marketing side. --Susan</i></p>

<p>Everybody is talking about how the iPhone is changing the game for mobile marketing, and that might be true, but I don't know. A good friend* once told me that "games have rules, so everyone knows when they are being played." -a nice double entendre  that begs the question, "is the mobile game really changing, or am I just being played?" With all the hype surrounding the launch of the 3G iPhone, it's kinda hard to tell. </p>

<p>I personally give less credit to the phone itself, and more credit to the true-web-browsing and the 3G connection, neither of which are completely unique to the iPhone. I have to admit that true-web-browsing over a 3G connection is cool, and it definitely changes the game, but what, specifically, about the iPhone makes it a game changer? This post will take a quick look at the rules to the old mobile game, the rules to the new mobile game, and how things are being played.</p>

<p><b> Game Rules:</b> Previous to the launch of the iPhone there were a couple of phones and mobile browsers that touted a 'true-web-browsing' experience, but most mobile browsing was still slow and clunky. With the old rules, most handsets presented a limited version of the web that used WAP or limited HTML. </p>

<p>In the old game, the experience was predominantly text based, and when images or designs came through, they were frequently garbled and confusing. JavaScript sub-menus would render in full (or wouldn't render at all), online forms didn't always work, and pages with multiple columns would stack, rather than display side by side. Mobile web browsing was cumbersome, slow and interactivity was relegated to what we could do with a simple scroll button, touch screen or arrow buttons.</p>

<p><b>New Game Rules:</b> With the release of the iPhone, and other phones with a 'true-web-browsing' experience, some rules have definitely changed. On most of these new phones, JavaScript and AJAX usually work, forms can almost always be filled in and submitted, and columns are displayed side-by-side, as directed by the HTML and CSS. Images and other design elements render as we would expect them to on our traditional computers. In general, it is a much more predictable, familiar experience.</p>

<p>The thing about the iPhone that really changes the game is less related to regular, every-day browsing and more related to advertising and downloadable applications. New ads and applications are being developed for the iPhone that leverage motion sensors (accelerometers) as well as sound, video and vibrate functions native in the iPhone. These applications are sure to create a new level of interactivity that marketers rarely have seen. </p>

<p>When <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgITSfrEILQ">third party applications</a> like the <a href="http://www.modmyifone.com/nativeapps/isaber/">iSaber</a>, (turns your iPhone into a light saber from Star Wars, complete with cool sound effects) and <a href="http://code.google.com/p/5dice/">Five Dice</a>, (allows you to play Yahtzee by shaking your iPhone to roll the Yahtzee dice) are monetized or used for branding it will be very powerful. (My personal favorite is <a href="http://www.appsafari.com/software/1003/sketches/">Sketches</a>, which is an art program that allows you to draw with your fingers and erase your work by shaking the phone like an Etch-a-Sketch!) If used correctly, this kind of interactivity can do a lot to create brand awareness, and loyalty. </p>

<p><b>How Things are Being Played:</b> AT&T reported that the average iPhone's data usage was three times higher than other smart phones, so the game has definitely been changed. <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080801-115059">Location based search</a>, and <a href="http://www.iphonematters.com/article/use_your_iphone_as_a_barcode_scanner_the_imatrix/">bar-code scanning</a> are certainly game changes for us marketers, but it has yet to be seen how these types of applications will be accepted.  </p>

<p>The iPhone certainly has a lot of cool features, but is also missing some big ones, and no one seems to have noticed. iPhones don't offer picture messaging (MMS) or video recording and they don't render Flash. (But what about all the hot-shot web designers who have simultaneously dedicated their lives to Apple AND Flash?) iPhones also don't come with the capability to record a voice note, or use an instant messenger program. It appears that the new phone functionality has traded off with some old functionality that some of us had gotten used to. </p>

<p>3G downloading is great, when it works, but exactly <a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/007220.html">when is that</a>? AT&T is a bit unclear about their 3G coverage, but it appears that if you are not in a major metropolitan area you will probably still be accessing the web via a slower EDGE network. </p>

<p><b>New Game -*Bonus Round*:</b> In my mind, we still need to find some middle ground between the new rules and the old rules. Zooming in and out and scrolling side to side is a problem for me, and it would be nice if Flash worked too. Perhaps it might be good if we move towards web development standards and browser rendering standards that allow traditional browsers to render a site one way, and mobile browsers to render the same site another way, without any additional effort on our part. </p>

<p>So maybe it doesn't matter if the iPhone gets the credit for the change or not. And perhaps the era of cumbersome mobile browsing has come to an end, and the game has definitely changed, but I am sure it is not done changing. The true-web-browsing experience is good, but still has a long way to go to be as good of a as browsing the web on your computer.</p>

<p>*Profound quote thanks to Jim Hedger, at around 2am, somewhere in NYC after SearchBash. :)</p>

<p><br />
<i><a href="http://www.bluemoonworks.com/Mobile-SEO.html">Cindy Krum</a> is the Director of New Media Strategies for Blue Moon Works, Inc. She brings fresh and creative ideas to the Blue Moon Works team, speaking at national and international trade events about mobile web marketing, social network marketing and international SEO. Cindy also writes for industry publications, and has been published in Website Magazine, Advertising & Marketing Review, Search Engine Land, ODG Intelligence, and quoted by many respected publications including PC World, Internet Retailer, TechWorld, Direct Magazine and Search Marketing Standard. </p>

<p>Cindy also currently serves as the co-chair of the SEMPO Emerging Technologies Mobile Web Task Force, and is an active member of the search community. Cindy is passionate about bringing creative online marketing solutions to clients, and working with clients to develop high level mobile and international marketing strategies.</i></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Teaching SEO that &quot;Everyone Knows&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/teaching_seo.html" />
<modified>2008-08-04T21:28:53Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-04T19:00:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1459</id>
<created>2008-08-04T19:00:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: Our guest blogging week continues! Next up is Carolyn Shelby reminding us of the need for getting back to basics. Everyone say hello! --Susan I&apos;m sitting down to write this guest post while TheLisa is on a much deserved vacation, and, of course, I&apos;m waiting until the very...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Search Engine Optimization</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: Our guest blogging week continues! Next up is Carolyn Shelby reminding us of the need for getting back to basics.  Everyone say hello! --Susan</i></p>

<p>I'm sitting down to write this guest post while TheLisa is on a much deserved vacation, and, of course, I'm waiting until the very last minute.</p>

<p>I blame my procrastination on writer's block. I hate-hate-hate the whole echo chamber thing, and I hate being a me-too-er. Blah, blah, blah, self-pity, blah, blah, whine, blah. You get the picture.</p>

<p>As I was wading through my thoughts and flailing about for a topic, I decided I needed some clarity. So I began with a clean sheet of paper and a fundamental question:</p>

<p>"In context of search, who am I?"</p>

<ul>
	<li>	I co-host SEO 101... so I discuss the fundamentals of SEO.</li>
	<li>	I talk to newbies and the non-savvy and help them move along the</li>
	<li>learning curve.</li>
	<li>	I explain the basics of SEO to non-search people.</li>
</ul>

<p>I recently gave a talk on the basics of SEO, SEM and Social to group of about four dozen old school marketers. Of the nearly 50 people in attendance, less than a handful claimed to know what SEO was, and upon further inquiry it turned out what they thought and what it is were not the same thing. Their industries varied widely, and they were at varying levels in the corporate food chain, but the one thing they all had in common was their desire to understand SEO and SEM.</p>

<p>No one cared that I was going over things "everyone knows already", because they *didn't* already know.</p>

<p>These people cared that they were moving out of the realm of magic and into the realm of science. They cared that they were going to be able to go back to work in the morning and not feel lost when talking to the IT department about the Marketing department's needs for the company website.</p>

<p>I ended up speaking for 53 minutes and even then, there was a rush afterward to ask more questions and get more information. These people wanted to learn the basics. They were hungry for the fundamentals that "everyone already knows."</p>

<p>So it turns out that my inability to come up with suitable blog topics is a result worrying too much about making sure search people liked my writing and subsequently losing focus on my real audience. For me, my real audience is the neophyte. My audience is people who need to learn the basics, not the seasoned professionals.</p>

<p>Writing is like being a minister... do you win more souls when you preach to the converted or when you bring the Word to the unwashed masses?</p>

<p>So having had this little epiphany, does this mean I should never again preach to the choir? No, when I have something to share that is not echo-chambery or me-too-y and substantively contributes to the academic discourse; then it is perfectly (to continue with the religious analogy) good, right and salutary to write for the benefit of colleagues and peers.</p>

<p><b>So what's the moral of the story?</b></p>

<blockquote>
Understand and define your audience, and then focus on doing what's best for THEM.
</blockquote>

<p>Knowing and understanding your readers makes it easier to come up with useful topics (and helps prevent writer's block). In my case, circulating in non-search circles and situations helps me further understand my core audience, which in turn helps me refine my writing so I'm providing them with a better experience and better serving their needs.</p>

<p><br />
<i><a href="http://www.cshel.com/">Carolyn Shelby</a> has been professionally developing Web sites and helping businesses integrate offline and online marketing since 1995. She is the co-host of SEO 101 on <a href="http://www.webmasterradio.fm">WebmasterRadio.fm</a> and is the Director of Natural Search for Chicago-based BeFoundLocal.com</i></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>An Insider&apos;s Look at the REAL Search Engine Marketing Play Book</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/08/an_insiders_loo.html" />
<modified>2008-08-04T19:45:51Z</modified>
<issued>2008-08-04T18:25:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1460</id>
<created>2008-08-04T18:25:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Editor&apos;s Note: With Lisa away, we&apos;re kicking off a week of guest stars. Up first is thoughts from everyone&apos;s favorite usability guru, Kim Krause Berg of Cre8pc.com/UsabilityEffect.com. --Susan Since my High School never won a football game, it wasn&apos;t until I went with a boyfriend to a big game between...</summary>
<author>
<name>Guest Author</name>

<email>sesparza@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Search Engine Optimization</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><i>Editor's Note: With Lisa away, we're kicking off a week of guest stars.  Up first is thoughts from everyone's favorite usability guru, Kim Krause Berg of Cre8pc.com/UsabilityEffect.com. --Susan</i></p>

<p>Since my High School never won a football game, it wasn't until I went with a boyfriend to a big game between Lehigh and Lafayette Universities that I got to watch a real, honest to goodness game of men smashing each other in front of cheering crowds.  I was bored out of my mind. The only part I understood was the Touchdown.  Other than that it looked, well, stupid. Why was I freezing my butt off for this?</p>

<p>Flash forward to the present.  I spent years as an SEO before switching over to the touchy-feely behavioral usability side. It matters not what I do, however.  Explaining it is as impossible as describing football is to me.  I simply say to folks, who ask what I do, "I help web sites score a touchdown" and they'll nod and act like they understand.</p>

<p>As luck would have it, I gave birth nearly 15 years ago to a bouncing baby future football star (according to him) named Stefan.  He's teaching me football. I'm listening because as of last week, he dead pressed 315 pounds, plus I referred to baseball runs as "points" in my blog. I'm not a hard core, experienced sports mom.  He got mad at me when I tried to put aloe on those marks weight lifters get above their knees.  Screamed "Ouch" like a baby and everything.</p>

<p>For those of you who wonder at the hoopla I sometimes make over SEO and Usability, I'll try to help you out.  I asked Stefan to let me borrow his 70 page Freshman High School Football Playbook, but I had to promise not to share any details on the actual plays with you because he was afraid Bruce Clay blog readers might try to come to Pennsylvania and spy or something.</p>

<p>Spying. Deception. Cloaking. Keyword analysis.  These are the very same lessons SEO's learn. They're doing battle.  They can't tell you every detail of each marketing play because Google would always win, and where's the fun in that? (And money.)</p>

<p>SEO is like the Offensive line.  According to the Playbook, there are 44 plays the team has to memorize.  Each guy has a position and according to whatever secret coded phrase the QB (Quarterback) mumbles in the huddle, this is a cue for where each player runs. I asked Stefan what happens if the QB mumbles and they don't all hear him right.  He said they just try to bash the first guy they see.</p>

<p>Again, this is what search engine optimization is like.  If you didn't hear the QB or learn the proper play, you just keyword stuff away like someone lit a fire under your butt and hope for the best.  Or better yet, if you don't like where your web site ranks, you can execute a play based on data analysis and practice so its more likely the results get you closer to a conversions Touchdown. </p>

<p>What I found fascinating in the early days of SEO was the number of search engines and directories and all the different methods there were to get web pages indexed and ranked.  Bruce Clay saved us a ton of time when he created a colorful diagram to keep up with things such as what search engines were fed by Inktomi and who was acquired by another search engine. </p>

<p>I kept my own less colorful text version of his chart on my Cre8pc site in those days.  I had listed each engine and directory with direct links to where you submitted your pages, their fees, rules, tips and what was connected to what. The sheer volume and scope of what SEO's have to memorize is not unlike what I now understand to be what football players also need to know.  </p>

<p>According to Stefan, some of the Coaches' rules are:</p>

<p>"You have to be aggressive."<br />
"You have to know the game plan." (And if you don't, Coach throws you off the team.)<br />
"You must demoralize your opponent."<br />
"No soda. It's 'poison'."</p>

<p>Usability is like the Defensive line. Once the Offense gets the game going, eventually the Defense comes barging in to make the kill.  An efficient, well built web site has the same affect and has been known to bleed customer wallets dry and break servers. There are only 22 plays for the Defense to memorize in Stefan's Playbook. Probably because it takes less thinking to block and tackle, konk, drive, slug and pile on top of the guy with the football. </p>

<p>As a Fullback and Quick Guard, Stefan has to learn a lot of plays with odd terms like Cadence, Running Game, and Pass Protection.  I think a hungry macho man invented plays with names like Wedge, Molasses, Trap Blocking, Waggle Strong Protection, Zorro, Jack (Lisa's Kitty!), Sex, Stud, Man to Man and Rocket Laser.</p>

<p>How so like the usability industry football is!  We memorize plays like usability, user experience, human factors, engabability, accessibility, captology, persuasive design, understandability, findability, information architecture, user interface, performance, and Jakob Nielsen.</p>

<p>A good football game is nothing without bouncy cheerleaders and screaming, beer jugging spectators.  Internet searchers and web site visitors at home or the office are not unlike a crowded football stadium watching pigskin being cradled by fully grown beefy men in tight pants. A ticket to a football game can cost as much as Google Ads and be just as coveted.</p>

<p>It's our job, as online marketers and site developers, to make our jobs look easy.  I think many of us do a great job at entertaining our spectators and maybe even some clients.  We can't be softies. We have to know our playbooks, understand and support teamwork, drink during work hours and smile for our clients even if their site just slipped in rank.  There are wins and losses. A web site that ranks number one and has championship conversions is worth the million dollar contracts we charge.</p>

<p>According to The Lisa, her favorite "Bruce-ism" is "It's not the job of SEO to put wings on a pig. It's the job of SEO to genetically re-engineer the pig into an eagle."</p>

<p>He sounds like Stefan's coach.</p>

<p><br />
<center>#</center></p>

<p><i>Usability consultant, Kimberly Krause Berg, is the owner of <a href="http://www.cre8pc.com">Cre8pc.com</a>, <a href="http://www.usabilityeffect.com">UsabilityEffect.com</a> and <a href="http://www.cre8asiteforums.com">Cre8asiteForums</a>. Her work combines usability testing with a working knowledge of search engine optimization.<br />
</i></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>SEO Training: What&apos;s Your Favorite Flavor?  </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/seo_training_whats_your_flavor.html" />
<modified>2008-07-31T23:25:22Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-31T00:13:40Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1458</id>
<created>2008-07-31T00:13:40Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Next week&apos;s episode of SEM Synergy will feature a segment on search engine optimization training. Since Virginia and Susan got to square off and debate the topic on the radio show, I thought I&apos;d give you a preview here on the blog. Mostly because I think SEO training is a...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Search Engine Optimization</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Next week's episode of <a href=http://www.semsynergy.com/>SEM Synergy</a> will feature a segment on search engine optimization training.  Since Virginia and Susan got to square off and debate the topic on the radio show, I thought I'd give you a preview here on the blog. Mostly because I think SEO training is a pretty important topic, and also because I don't like being left out of conversations. [That's the understatement of the century. --Susan]</p>

<p>I think the importance of white hat SEO training is becoming really clear. As the industry evolves, we're starting to see a lot of white hat/black hat, "is X technically spamming?" type conversations popping up in blogs, forums and conferences. And if you don't know what's what, it's hard to make sense of it all and to know which tactics are approved and which you should stay away from. While blogs and forums can be a great place for information, these resources don't become truly impactful until you have a solid SEO foundation to pull from. </p>

<p>So what are some of the different outlets for search engine optimization training?</p>

<ul><li><strong>Online Training</strong>:  Let's be honest, most of the established SEO training courses are happening on either the West Coast or the East Coast. That's great if you live there, but not too great if you're landlocked or outside the United States.  Online training gives search marketers a relatively inexpensive and flexible way to brush up on their SEO knowledge, without incurring travel costs. Students can go at their own pace and are often given downloadable materials that they can reuse, either as a refresher or to help train new people as they come in.

<p>One of the best examples of a great online SEO Training course is the one offered by <a href=http://www.sempoinstitute.com/>SEMPO</a>. They offer both basic and advanced training to help search marketers of all knowledge levels.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Seminar Training</strong>: I think seminar training is one of the best ways to learn about search engine optimization because it allows you to take notes, do homework, interact with an instructor and put your knowledge to use while still being supervised.  You get a great wealth of knowledge poured into your brain and you get to ask questions on the topics you feel running off the sides. Seminar training is especially effective when it comes with an opportunity to try out the various techniques and tools being taught in the class. The down-side to seminar training is that you have to listen to everyone else's questions and it often requires travel.</p>

<p>Bruce Clay's <a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/seo/training.htm>SEO training</a> course is a good example of seminar training.  You come and learn with us, attend a lab where you can put your newly earned smarts to use, and then you back home and work your magic on your own site.  If you prefer, we also offer on-site training for companies looking to train 20 or more employees.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>On-Site Training</strong>: If you can afford it, onsite SEO training is the most effective (and the most pricey) way to learn search engine optimization because you can teach your entire team in one sitting.  If you have 20 SEOs, you don't have to pay travel expenses on all 20 of them. Or, if you want to really be ahead of the game, you can pull together your IT people with your marketing people with your vice presidents and get everyone involved.  This is a great way to teach those executives about the importance of SEO and increase your chances at getting them to sign off on projects.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Conferences</strong>: Conferences offer attendees to learn from experts while also establishing valuable connections that may assist them in the future. Larger conferences allow you to focus in broader topics, while the niche shows will help break down highlighted verticals.</p>

<p><a href=http://www.searchenginestrategies.com>SES</a> offers a stellar broad industry look, while <a href=http://www.searchmarketingexpo.com>SMX</a> has really shown itself to be the conference of choice to master the verticals. Both provide ample networking opportunities and can introduce attendees to important people in the space.</li></ul></p>

<p>Often the best way to learn about search engine optimization is through a combination of hands on experience and one or two of the methods listed above. If you're looking for additional info, check out Virginia's article on <a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/newsletter/volume49/seotraining.html>Search Engine Optimization Training Opportunities</a> or tune into SEM Synergy next Wednesday at 12pm PST to hear Susan and Virginia debate the topic. </p>

<p>Just a reminder to our East Coast friends, if you've been eyeing Bruce Clay's SEO training class but were concerned about making the trek to the West Coast, you can catch our SEO training class in New York following SMX East. Details should be up on the SMX site shortly.  <br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Can You Be A Corporate Blogger Without Losing Yourself?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/can_you_be_a_co.html" />
<modified>2008-07-28T23:34:05Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-28T23:32:34Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1457</id>
<created>2008-07-28T23:32:34Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">One of the topics I discussed with my new BlogHer friends last weekend was the struggles that come with trying to maintain your own voice when you agree to blog for a corporation. Unless you&apos;re an all out corporate drone, there will inevitably come a time when you and your...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>One of the topics I discussed with my new BlogHer friends last weekend was the struggles that come with trying to maintain your own voice when you agree to blog for a corporation.  Unless you're an all out corporate drone, there will inevitably come a time when you and your organization have a difference of opinion on some issues. Should corporate bloggers be allowed to express views that don't align with corporate thought or, as a corporate blogger, are you to follow company rhetoric at all costs?</p>

<p>I think there's definitely a sweet spot in there where bloggers need to learn how to support the company they're working for while still staying true to themselves.  I'd like to think we do a pretty good job of it over here. I think people understand that I'm serious about search engine optimization ethics because <em>I'm</em> serious about it and not because Bruce Clay has its own Code of Ethics. I also think they know that if Bruce said something on a panel that I didn't agree with that I would ever so carefully debate the issue here on the blog . ;) There's a line that I think corporate bloggers have to walk.</p>

<p>Really, it's an issue of authenticity. Are you going to speak up for issues you believe in and gain your readers' trust or are you going to regurgitate corporate doctrine? I know that people don't come here for straight search engine optimization advice. If you wanted SEO advice, you'd be reading our <a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/web_rank.htm>search engine optimization methodology</a>, which has more information than you could possible handle in one sitting. You're on the blog for real, genuine thought, so that's what we strive to give. </p>

<p>I've been blogging for Bruce Clay, Inc. for almost two and a half years (zomg!) and over that time a couple of truths have become clear.  I've learned that the only way I can be successful blogging for a company is if (a) I believe in the company I work for and (b) the company believes in me. Luckily, both of these factors are met with my current gig.  I get to write about important SEO issues that both I and the company I'm working for believe in.</p>

<p>But not everyone I spoke to at BlogHer was in that situation.</p>

<p>I think a lot of the reasoning behind why corporations are afraid to let bloggers speak out on topics they may not agree with is because they're afraid of portraying a fragmented voice. And while I get that, I think it's a completely outdated way to look at things. I think we're beyond the days of the "organizational stance" or "organization perspective". Sure, as a company, you may strive for a certain way of doing things, but you're blind if you can't admit that there's room for dissent.  [Robert Scoble's entire Microsoft tenure was based on precisely the idea that you can be a dissenting individual and a corporate voice at the same time.--Susan] Organizations are made up of people and people are different. We see things in a different way, we respond to things differently, and we want different things. And there's nothing wrong with that. I think it's beneficial for companies to show that they're open to a diversity of views and opinions. I don't for a second think it makes the company weaker.</p>

<p>Obviously there's a line to be drawn. If you're Bruce Clay, Inc., you don't want a blogger advocating black hat search engine optimization because that violates the core of what you do. But I don't see the harm in talking about different tactics. Maybe I want to write a post about using Twitter for your social media campaign, something Bruce may not be totally sold on just yet. I know that I have the freedom to do that. And if my post is strong, I know Bruce is open-minded enough that I may sway him, or at least open up the door for him to come and chat with me about it. </p>

<p>There's no reason why you should have to leave your own personal voice and agenda at the door when you sign on to be a blogger for a large corporation. I don't think you <em>can</em> leave those things behind otherwise, what are you giving people?  </p>

<p>It's tricky, this whole corporate blogging thing because at the end of the day it comes a balancing act of figuring out how to please your audience, your boss and yourself all at the same.</p>

<p>For me, it's really important that I'm able to represent Bruce Clay, Inc. while still holding on to who I am. I'm not going to argue something or not argue it because it may contradict some of what we believe. I think there's room for discussion in the search engine optimization industry. And while Bruce may respect that, I know that in some companies there are legal departments breathing down bloggers' necks monitoring what they write, pushing industry jargon down their throats to help sell a product. If that's the type of company you're working for, quit. Just get out.  You're not going to be given the freedom to blog authentically. And without that, what's the point? </p>

<p>[It's a good lesson for corporations as well. If you aren't hiring people who believe the same things you believe, who want the same things you want--or who are, at least, looking in the same direction--what sort of hiring are you doing?  Success comes from having people you trust to do the things that are going to make you successful.  Hiring a blogger and not letting her be a real person is the fastest way to create an inauthentic experience for customers.--Susan]  <I>Amen.</i></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The Use of Fake Avatars In Social Media</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/the_use_of_fake.html" />
<modified>2008-07-28T21:40:14Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-28T21:39:03Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1456</id>
<created>2008-07-28T21:39:03Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Creating fake avatars as a way to boost your social media efforts - it&apos;s a topic I&apos;ve tried my best to stay away from tackling. Mostly because I don&apos;t want a riot to break out on the blog. I&apos;d rather those riots take place elsewhere and leave our blog filled...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Branding</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Creating fake avatars as a way to boost your social media efforts - it's a topic I've tried my best to stay away from tackling. Mostly because I don't want a riot to break out on the blog. I'd rather those riots take place elsewhere and leave our blog filled with talk of unicorns and puppies and cupcakes. However, it doesn't look like the debate is dying down. </p>

<p>The topic of fake avatars was one of the most controversial discussed at SMX Advanced's Give It Up session, it was (arguably) the center of last week's blogosphere meltdown and now <a href=http://www.wolf-howl.com/socialmedia/fake-social-media-profiles/>Michael Gray is talking about it again</a>. And what's our favorite thing to do on a Monday morning? Disagree with Michael! ;)</p>

<p>I don't think it'll come as a surprise to anyone that I find the idea of using fake avatars a bad marketing decision. If that makes me a <a href=http://www.semclubhouse.com/im-a-social-media-goody-2-shoes-and-proud-of-it/>social media goody 2 shoes</a>, then at least I'm in good company. </p>

<p>In his post today, Michael Gray mentioned how Barack Obama doesn't run his own social media campaign even though he's nearing 50,000 Twitter followers, 400,000+ MySpace friends, and has more YouTube friends that he probably knows what to do with.  He also mentions the famed GoogleGuy account and how it was kept alive by a number of different people. Michael makes the argument if it's okay for Google and the Democratic Party Presidential Nominee to do it, why not SEOs?</p>

<p>Easy. Because it's completely different.</p>

<p>I think (or at last I'd hope) that the average person has enough common sense to realize that it's not Barack sitting at his computer approving your Facebook Friend Request and that GoogleGuy is a Google entity, not a person. They should realize that when a person friends Barack on Twitter and he immediately follows you back, that it was probably a bot doing the work. There's a certain expectation there that Barack's profile is being backed by a team of supporters and handlers. No one is pretending that it's really Barack. That's the difference.</p>

<p>And remember how people mocked Google for its use of the GoogleGuy account? Is that the reaction you want from your customers?</p>

<p>In my opinion, there's a huge difference between creating a fake avatar and creating a brand ambassador to empower you on the social networks.  I think brand ambassadors provide a lot of value to a social community. They give members someone to interact with, reach out to, and support. </p>

<p>For example, I love <a href=http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=5235881>Bangerang cupcakes</a> aka cupcakes in a jar. I've bought them for myself, for friends and even for people I don't like because <em>that's how good they are</em>. If the company were to create a Facebook profile using the name Bangerang Jane, I'd follow them in a second. I'd read through their news feed, check out their photos, listening to what they were saying, etc. I'd interact with this avatar because I know what it is. I know that it's an ambassador for the brand. It's transparent and I get it. </p>

<p>But if they were to create a fake avatar using the name Katie Cake and pretend that they're a real person and had Bangerang cupcakes listed among their favorite things, with photos of them eating Bangerang cupcakes, I'd find that deceitful. That person doesn't exist. I don't care how "active" in the community you want to make that account, it's still not a real person. <strong>You can't have genuine interaction with someone that doesn't exist.</strong></p>

<p>The difference between a manufactured social media profile and a brand ambassador is the faking. I was at SMX Advanced when one of the panelists talked about <a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/smx_advanced_2008_give_it_up.html>creating fake avatars to push your brand</a>. He mentioned using interest category listed on StumbleUpon to make the fake people look real.  To find pictures of people on Flickr and use them as the profile picture. To give them fake interests because that helps manipulating people into thinking the avatar is a real person. </p>

<p>The intent there is to deceive. If it was about supporting the community, you could go the way of a brand ambassador. Creating fake people is not genuine, it's not real, and it gives social media a bad name. I have to ask, why go through all that trouble to create something that's fake when you can create something that's real and has a heck of a lot more value?  Why pretend to be Katie from Illinois who loves Bangerang Cupcakes and talks about them all day when you can just be Bangerang Katie? If the product is good, your supporters will be there. There's no need to fake it.</p>

<p>I recently had the chance to <a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/six_questions_with_kendall_allen.html>interview Kendall Allen from Incognito Digital</a> and I asked her about fake avatars and whether she agreed with that approach. In case you missed the interview, here was Kendall's response:</p>

<blockquote>Yeah, no. In the purist's spirit of authenticity and brand - I would not favor this fragile stretch to authority. Authority should be based on real roots, history and establishment of true connections. Anything along the lines suggested creates false path and in effect undermines the "social" in social media. It certainly undermines the community flow - one you want to harness, not dupe.</blockquote>

<p>Hear that? You need true connections that don't undermine the community. At the end of the day, people don't like to be deceived. And when you create a <em>fake</em> person with <em>fake</em> interests and <em>fake</em> pictures, it is FAKE. That goes against everything social media is supposed to be about.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Friday Recap</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/friday_recap_88.html" />
<modified>2008-07-25T19:39:46Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-25T19:37:50Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1455</id>
<created>2008-07-25T19:37:50Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Susan&apos;s been out of the office since Wednesday as she gets her geek on at nerd prom. Let&apos;s all take a moment to mock her. No, a longer moment. Okay. Speaking of Susan, this week Copyblogger wrote a post about how to be interesting. I&apos;ve already printed it out for...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Fun Stuff</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Susan's been out of the office since Wednesday as she gets her geek on at <a href=http://www.comic-con.org/>nerd prom</a>.  Let's all take a moment to mock her. </p>

<p>No, a longer moment.</p>

<p>Okay. </p>

<p>Speaking of Susan, this week Copyblogger wrote a post about <a href=http://www.copyblogger.com/how-to-be-interesting/>how to be interesting</a>. I've already printed it out for her and taped it to her computer. I just know she's going to thank me.</p>

<p>David Snyder is trying to <a href=http://twitter.com/davesnyder/statuses/865405677>buy me a Boxer puppy</a>. You should help him.</p>

<center><img src=http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3157/2702138416_9d0014b7e8.jpg></center>

<p>Andrew Goodman won my heart with his post about why he'd <a href=http://www.traffick.com/2008/07/candy-ass-social-media-goody-2-shoes.asp>hire the candy ass social media goody 2 shoes</a> over the social media spammer. It's an awesome post and worth your time to read. </p>

<p>Tired of training your husband? Husbandhero.com is here to <a href=http://www.901am.com/2008/lazy-husbands-learn-how-to-be-romantic.html>teach men how to be romantic</a> by making it "convenient" with monthly reminders for the romance-challenged. The service will send your guy tips for not sucking, as well as milestone reminders to let them know you have a birthday coming up. I don't know. Is masking failure really improving it? Maybe I'm just relationship bitter.</p>

<p>Language Trainers has a great viral video <a href=http://www.languagetrainersgroup.com/accent_game.html>guessing where people's accents are from</a>. Virginia did pretty well... I not so much. She's so much smarter than me. [Silly rabbit. Maybe my headphones were just clearer than yours? -Virginia]</p>

<p>Chris Hooley hit his blog to talk about his <a href=http://www.chris-hooley.com/2008/07/24/howto-identity-theft/>experiences with identity theft</a>. Some scary stuff, and I'm not just talking about the mug shot of the jerk who pretended to be the awesome Chris Hooley. We love you, Chris.</p>

<p>Valleywag says that <a href=http://valleywag.com/5021570/half-of-the-50-hottest-girls-on-digg-are-fake-++-but-the-site-works-anyway>half of the hottest girls on Digg are fake</a>. Score one for the cult of Marty Weintraub!                                                   </p>

<p>Here are <a href=http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/14-podcasts-to-help-you-through-your-commute/>14 podcasts to help you through your commute</a>, assuming you have a commute and didn't move into an apartment complex down the street from your job. Like I did. Nothing's sweeter than filling up your gas tank once a month. [Rubbing it in our faces <i>twice</i> in one week? Last time I didn't comment, being too enamored with my shiny new T-Mobile card. But this time you've gone too far! -Virginia]</p>

<p>I'd like to thank <a href=http://www.seomoz.org/team/jane>Jane "Catland" Copland</a> for ruining my morning by twittering a link to a <a href=http://www.orange.co.uk/news/quirkies/default.htm?rm=storyitem&storyId=2941186>piglet with a monkey face</a>. Don't click the link. It's the most horrifying thing I've ever seen. I'm now afraid to have children. What if they're born with a monkey face? It could be like, an epidemic or something!</p>

<p><a href=http://www.webmetricsguru.com/2008/07/iring_lets_you_marry_apple.html>Marshall Sponder turned me on</a> to iRing, which is almost as horrifying as the monkey-faced pig, but in a far more geeky way.</p>

<p>The Aussie Bloggers have come up with the <a href=http://www.aussiebloggers.com.au/2008/07/23/our-present-to-you/>lazy bloggers post generator</a>. Hmm, I wonder if I could just post like that from now on? I bet people wouldn't even notice. I never make sense anyway.</p>

<p>Sante J. Achille says <a href=http://www.multilingual-search.com/italians-dislike-online-publicity/22/07/2008>Italians dislike online publicity</a>. Which makes sense, otherwise all those mob people would be dead or arrested. Right?</p>

<p><a href=http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/photos-of-partying-defendants-lead-to-prison-time-why-perception-is-reputation.html>Andy Beal teaches us an important lesson</a> - if you're going to pretend to be remorseful in court to avoid jail time for that DUI, don't show up to a Halloween party dressed as an inmate. And if you <em>do</em> get dressed up as an inmate, make sure no one takes photos and uploads them to Facebook. Have fun in jail!</p>

<p>TV Week let us know that the CW will <a href=http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/07/gossip_girl_again_streaming_on.php>once again be streaming Gossip Girl</a>, aka the most awesome show on television, online.  I consider this a tiny victory for 14-year-old girls (and me and Susan) everywhere.</p>

<p><a href=http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/sf/house-tours/house-call-maggie-mason-of-mighty-goodssan-francisco-056122>Apartment Therapy invaded</a> the house of <a href=http://mightygirl.com/>Maggie Mason</a>, one of my favorite bloggers, and gave us a sweet tour.  I love the American Gothic-style wedding portrait, all the word art, and basically the whole darn apartment. I wonder if she'd let me live there? I can babysit.</p>

<p>Oh, and next time the water bill is really high, <a href=http://wtfurls.com/world-news/135/my-cat-ran-up-a-300-water-bill-wtf>investigate the cat</a>. Hilariously expensive.</p>

<p>Things I Learned On Boing Boing This Week:</p>

<ul>
	<li>The Swiss <a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/22/viscous-keyboardclea.html>use goo to clean their keyboards</a>. Is that really less gross?</li>
	<li><a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/22/science-tees-for-the.html>Science T-shirts</a> are fun.</li>
	<li>Is there anything funnier than looking at photos of people who think they're about to be <a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/19/photo-of-people-flin.html>hit in the face with a large object</a>? If my giggling means anything, no, there isn't. </li>
	<li>Note to self: <a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/18/photograph-of-jumpin.html>Don't surf in Florida</a>. There are sharks. Kthx.</li>
	<li>Don't put a <a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/18/roomba-with-animatro.html>chimp head on your Roomba</a>. That's just wrong. [Disagree! A brilliant idea! -Virginia]</li>
	<li>There's a name for my condition. It's called <a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/25/truman-show-disorder.html>Truman Show Disorder</a>. [If the world really <i>does</i> revolve around you, is it still a disorder? 'Cause everybody hearts the Lisa! -Virginia] <i>We're waiting for Virginia's disillusionment to kick in any day now. We'll keep you posted.</i></li>
</ul>

<p>Also, Virginia's birthday was yesterday. If you didn't get a chance to wish her a Happy Birthday and lots of yummy thoughts, feel free to use the comments.  :)</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Women Love the Michelin Man</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/women_love_the_michelin_man.html" />
<modified>2008-07-23T19:23:54Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-23T19:19:20Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1454</id>
<created>2008-07-23T19:19:20Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">As you know, I was at BlogHer last week. And another conference means another tote bag filled with goodies that you have to lug around. The BlogHer bag was like the typical SES schwag bag, only cooler and prettier and more useful. There were pens and shirts and books and...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Branding</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href=http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/newsflash_blogher.html>As you know</a>, I was at BlogHer last week. And another conference means another tote bag filled with goodies that you have to lug around. The BlogHer bag was like the typical SES schwag bag, only cooler and prettier and more useful.  There were pens and shirts and books and DVDs and bottles of water and a magic 8-ball and a T-Mobile HotSpot card [which Lisa gifted to me! -Virginia] and stickers and lots of other neat stuff. One of the most random things I came across in that tote was the Michelin man tire gauge. Yes, a tire gauge. Given to a bunch of women. I was confused too. I even Twittered it:</p>

<center><img src=http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3281/2695882493_fe8da8eac0.jpg></center>

<p>It just seemed odd and out of place. I didn't get it. Until Saturday morning.</p>

<p>Early Saturday, before the Hybrid Media: How We Will All Work Together to Build a Converged-Media Future keynote, the audience was Michelin-ized by a female Michelin rep. She stood up and gave the audience a quick talk about some of the stuff Michelin was doing and how BlogHer and her team actually have a lot in common.  </p>

<p>Here were some of the highlights:</p>

<ul>
	<li>Michelin is providing more than 200 tons of carbon offsetting to make up for the environmental impact of everyone flying across the country to attend BlogHer. </li>
	<li>Michelin cares about your children's safety. They're dedicated to it. </li>
	<li>Michelin has just announced the new Latitude Tour tire designed to increase fuel-efficiency and save you money. </li>
	<li>Michelin wanted to be at BlogHer because they care about women. By using the tire gauge left in your tote bag, you can check your tires and increase fuel efficiency.</li>
</ul>

<p>There was cheering when she was done. And when the cheering stopped, a video showing the Michelin Man's adorable trek to San Francisco was played. There were shots of him riding trolleys and posing with the founders of BlogHer. And then the Michelin Man himself made an appearance and ran through the crowd hugging ladies and posing for pictures. </p>

<p>There was more cheering. And Michelin Man groping.</p>

<p>The night before I may not have understood what Michelin was doing at BlogHer and questioned why they put some sort of funky tire pressure thingy into my bag. But sitting in that ballroom before the keynote, I totally got it.  Well done, Michelin.</p>

<p>Michelin knows the spending power of women. They know the lengths people will go to keep their kids safe and to save money as gas prices go through the roof. Michelin crashed BlogHer and appealed to these needs. They had just made the marketing win of a lifetime by being smart enough to attend an event other big brands would have feared to go near, especially if you're a company selling tires.</p>

<p>I have to give Michelin credit for going after and winning over an audience that may not have been the obvious target. But they studied the women of BlogHer, found out what they were interested in (the environment, keeping their kids safe, etc.), used the tactics they knew would appeal to them, and launched a really powerful campaign. And the reaction in the blogosphere has been overwhelmingly positive. The entire thing was twittered, there are <a href=http://youtube.com/results?search_query=michelin+man+blogher&search_type=>videos on YouTube</a> of women squealing over their chance to meet the Michelin Man and bloggers are happy. </p>

<p>Over at <a href=http://www.backinskinnyjeans.com/2008/07/blogher-08-meet.html>Back in Skinny Jeans</a> (an awesome blog, BTW), Stephanie Quilao writes:</p>

<blockquote>Putting on my old marketing hat, the companies that need to get themselves in front of the BlogHer audience are the typically male messaged products which more and more women are buying themselves now like cars, tires, home improvement, insurance, and personal finance...Michelin was a big sponsor, and I'm telling you more women will be looking at their tires because hey, they are paying attention to our needs. I recently had to buy tires myself, and I didn't have a clue. But after talking to the Michelin folks, I'm definitely going to look at them next time I need tires. </blockquote>

<p>That's powerful. </p>

<p>In all honestly, when it comes to my car, I don't know anything about it. I don't know how it runs. I don't know what I should be doing to make it more efficient. I just know that once a month I have to put gas in it (I live less than 2 miles from work. Go ahead, hate me) and that sometimes it needs an oil change. </p>

<p>It's important that you know your target audience and what you need to be doing to address their needs and keep them happy. But you also want to be thinking of ways to bring in outsiders. I am not the target audience for Michelin tires. But Michelin figured out a way to market to me in a way that was genuine and authentic.  And it worked. For me, new tires now means Michelins.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>SEO Headlines</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/07/seo_headlines_21.html" />
<modified>2008-07-22T23:16:28Z</modified>
<issued>2008-07-22T23:15:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.bruceclay.com,2008:/blog//1.1453</id>
<created>2008-07-22T23:15:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Facebook Redesigns, Takes Focus Off Apps Everyone&apos;s talking about the new Facebook redesign and it&apos;s not all good. It seems like Facebook has strayed away from what they originally promised and has instead taken on a new FriendFeed feel where all updates are combined into a single content stream. ReadWriteWeb...</summary>
<author>
<name>Lisa Barone</name>
<url>www.bruceclay.com</url>
<email>lbarone@bruceclay.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><b>Facebook Redesigns, Takes Focus Off Apps</b></p>

<p>Everyone's talking about the <a href=http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=14612150958&topic=6283>new Facebook redesign</a> and it's not all good.  It seems like Facebook has strayed away from what they originally promised and has instead taken on a new FriendFeed feel where all updates are combined into a single content stream. <a href=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_redesign_to_go_live_tomorrow.php>ReadWriteWeb seems to like it</a>, personally, I don't. Maybe it's because I don't use FriendFeed so it all looks quite foreign and odd to me. It's also weird that they seem to be taking attention off the applications, hiding them behind an Applications tab. It will help make profiles less cluttered, but it seems like they're cutting off the lifeblood of their site. </p>

<p>Facebook's new design is slowly being rolled out to its 80 million users over the next few days. If you don't have the new design and you want it, you can use <a href=http://www.new.facebook.com/>www.new.facebook.com</a> to check it out. If you see it and don't like it, you may see a Back to Old Facebook link up top that will let you revert, at least for now. </p>

<p><b>Dealing With Blogger Bullies</b></p>

<p>In what could be seen as oddly timely, the Blog Herald had a post today about <a href=http://www.blogherald.com/2008/07/21/prepare-yourself-for-the-blog-bullies/>preparing yourself for blog bullies</a>. If you find yourself among the group afraid to head to Sphinn in fear of what you may find lately, you may want to give it a read.</p>

<p>Blog Herald takes the stance that being mean is simply human nature and it's something you need to prepare for. People are going to write nasty things about you because they want traffic and they're not smart enough to get it on their own. Knowing this means you need to create a solid comment policy to block it out, realizing it's a ploy, putting yourself in the right mindset to deal with it and finally, knowing when to take the situation offline. </p>

<p>Blog bullies have always been around but we're definitely seeing more pointed, vicious attacks spur up lately in the SEO community. I don't know what's causing it, but it's sad and it needs to stop. <a href=http://www.seo-scoop.com/2008/07/21/refuse-to-participate-in-vicious-industry/>Donna Fontenot</a> spoke out, so has a reluctant <a href=http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/017750.html>Barry from Search Engine Roundtable</a>. I'm not going to add to the discussion, but as Blog Herald points out, let's remember that we're all human and treat each other with respect. Also remember that being mean is human nature, so prepare for it.</p>

<p><b>Fun Finds</b></p>

<p>Instead of asking if grammar matters, Performancing takes a different approach and asks <a href=http://performancing.com/does-quality-writing-directly-correlate-bloggers-success>if the quality of your content directly correlates to a bloggers success</a>. I think the answer here is absolutely yes, especially if you define "content quality" as readability, the ability to convey a message and to evoke a certain emotion. If you're unable to express yourself and your message, </p>

<p>Li Evans jumps into the comments over at Sphinn to let us know that <a href=http://sphinn.com/story/60411#c48439>there WERE male speakers at BlogHer</a>. Take that, Michael Gray. ;) </p>

<p>Hjortur Smarason picks out <a href=http://blog.scope.is/marketing_safari/2008/07/6-common-mistak.html>6 Common Mistakes Companies Make In Social Media</a>.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>